Over 40 law firms still to refund RAF for duplicate payments made to them in 'error'
Over 40 of the 102 law firms reported to the Legal Practice Council (LPC) for allegedly not repaying duplicate payments made into their trust accounts by the Road Accident Fund (RAF), have not yet paid back the money.
The RAF asked the council to investigate 102 law firms, alleging they owe them more than R340m paid into their trust accounts in error.
Transport minister Fikile Mbalula, in response to a parliamentary question posed by the IFP asking for an update on the matter, said 42 of the 102 law firms reported to the LPC for mismanagement of their trust accounts, “have as yet not repaid the duplicate payments they received from the RAF”.
Mbalula named all 102 law firms, including the 42, in his reply to the IFP.
“As part of its recovery procedures the RAF withheld further payment to law firms identified as having received duplicate payments.”
But Mbulula indicated that a full bench of the North Gauteng High Court delivered judgment in April in “the matter of Road Accident Fund v Legal Practice Council and Others, ordering the suspension of certain categories of writs of execution and warrants of attachment against the RAF.
“ ... and in its judgment states that it does not believe that the RAF should withhold payments from successful claimants because of a dispute between the RAF and the law firms acting for the claimants,” he said.
“The court indicated that the RAF must instead approach the court on a case-by-case basis.
“Consequently, the RAF has brought an application in the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, citing the 42 legal firms; the LPC; the Sheriff, Pretoria Central; the Sheriff, Pretoria East; the Sheriff, Centurion East the Sheriff, Johannesburg Central; the Sheriff, Johannesburg North; and, ABSA Bank Ltd,” said Mbalula.
- Click here to read the full Parliamentary question and answers document
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments? Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.