Gerrie Nel preparing to privately prosecute Julius Malema
Advocate Gerrie Nel is preparing to privately prosecute Julius Malema for fraud and tender corruption.
The case relates to Malema's On-Point Engineering in Limpopo‚ involving work for the roads department.
In 2012‚ former Public Protector Thuli Madonsela was hard-hitting about Malema's involvement in the lucrative roads and bridges tender‚ saying he improperly benefited from the Limpopo government contract.
"Our primary question was: Did Malema benefit? We are saying 'yes' - an emphatic yes‚" she said at the time.
The report was the result of investigations launched the previous year after Madonsela received complaints about the awarding of a multimillion-rand tender to On-Point Engineering‚ a company from which Malema subsequently resigned as a director.
Madonsela said her evidence was to be handed to the state agencies - including the Hawks.
The Limpopo department of roads and transport paid R43-million to On-Point and Madonsela found that:
- On-Point paid R2.17-million through R100‚000-a-month dividends into Malema's Ratanang Family Trust over 17 months;
- The trust also received R200‚000 in "unspecified loans";
- Five days after one of the alleged "kickbacks" to the trust was made‚ R1-million was withdrawn and paid towards the purchase of a farm;
- Amounts of R160‚000 and R100‚000 were paid from the trust to "Sandton Property" and "Sandowns Property" respectively; and
- There was evidence that the trust "was probably used as a vehicle for the transfer of funds obtained through an unlawful process".
Madonsela found that Malema used his political position to influence the awarding of the tender that benefited his trust.
Madonsela also found a series of contraventions of Treasury regulations by the Limpopo government.
"The awarding of the tender to On-Point by the department was unlawful‚ improper and constituted maladministration‚" she said.
Madonsela's report - On the Point of Tenders - found that guidelines for the awarding of tenders were ignored and called the way in which they were awarded "mind-boggling".
She said that‚ despite stark differences between the bid document and On-Point's tax clearance certificate‚ the company was not disqualified from tendering.
The tax certificate was from a five-month-old shelf company.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments? Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.