We've got news for you.

Register on SowetanLIVE at no cost to receive newsletters, read exclusive articles & more.
Register now

Canada won’t take our money‚ say Guptas over ‘missing’ $41-million plane

Ajay Gupta is a fugitive. File Photo
Ajay Gupta is a fugitive. File Photo

The controversial Gupta family says it has every right to fly its Bombardier jet around the world because the Canadian bank that financed it refuses to take their money.

Export Development Canada (EDC) went to court to ground the jet because the Guptas had allegedly defaulted on repayments‚ and to stop the family from using it to commit crimes or flee from justice.

The Hawks consider Ajay Gupta a fugitive.

But an aviation newsletter has reported the jet registered in South Africa as ZS-OAK‚ which was thought to be missing and hidden from creditors‚ flew from Dubai to Delhi on Saturday and returned to Dubai on Monday.

ZS-OAK’s latest flight took place just before Indian authorities reportedly conducted multiple raids on Gupta properties and offices in Saharanpur on Tuesday morning.

In February‚ EDC applied to the High Court in Johannesburg for an urgent order to force the Guptas to return the aircraft or face having it deregistered pending the outcome of legal proceedings in the UK. The case is due to be heard on Friday.

The Civil Aviation Authority said it would not oppose the application.

But the Guptas argue that EDC lent them $41-million (about R483.5-million) to buy the jet despite being aware of the reputational risks involved. They also claim the EDC wanted to seize the plane as a "face-saving exercise"‚ not because the family had defaulted on payments.

EDC’s complaint that it could not keep tabs on ZS-OAK’s movements because its "public tracker" had been disconnected was "of no consequence" because the Guptas’ UK lawyers had disclosed the aircraft’s location to the bank.

This is all contained in opposing papers filed by Gupta executive Ronica Ragavan.

In an affidavit obtained by the publication‚ dated February 27‚ Ragavan said the Guptas had defaulted only once‚ in October 2017‚ because the Bank of Baroda had delayed effecting a repayment. Once the payment was made‚ the Canadian bank withdrew its termination notice. In December 2017‚ EDC cancelled the loan and in February went to court to ground the jet.

In its papers‚ the bank said the Guptas had defaulted on payments "more than a dozen" times between October 2017 and January 2018. The Guptas still owe EDC $27-million (about R318.4-million)‚ according to the bank.

But in their responding papers the Guptas countered that Westdawn was prevented from paying the bank because it had "unlawfully" ended their lease with Stoneriver‚ a special-purpose vehicle registered in Ireland. As a result the Guptas were "entitled to continue the enjoyment of the full spectrum of rights granted under the lease agreement".

Westdawn leases the aircraft from Stoneriver‚ which loaned $41-million for 80% of the aircraft’s purchase price from EDC in April 2015. The Guptas paid Bombardier a deposit of $10-million (just under R118-million) for the jet in December 2014 and stand surety for the EDC loan.

The Guptas had offered to exercise their right to end the lease and buy the aircraft but had not received a response from EDC.

Their offer would be accepted if EDC was "truly interested in their commercial interests‚ rather than some unspecified political agenda‚ which they now seem to harbour" against the Guptas‚ Ragavan said.

Other "contract breaches" EDC cited for cancelling the loan were "minor technical defaults". These included allegations that Westdawn and other Gupta firms had received corrupt payments from the Estina dairy project and from coal contracts with Eskom.

These presented a "clear risk of criminal‚ civil and reputational sanctions" for the Guptas‚ the bank said.

Ragavan herself appeared in court in connection with the Estina dairy project. She is currently out on bail.

Would you like to comment on this article? Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

Commenting is subject to our house rules.