“For the asset forfeiture procedures we opted for a much quicker approach‚ which is the civil forfeiture‚ which is not necessarily dependent on a criminal conviction. We were able to make some serious inroads‚ with the view of assuring that we identify and freeze the assets before it’s too late‚ realising that the actual criminal investigation is going to take some time‚” he said.
Molelle said that in terms of the current order‚ both Trillian and McKinsey had indicated their willingness to return the funds.
“From our engagement to date with Trillian there has been an indication and willingness to cooperate with a view of ensuring the undue benefit is returned to the state. This is just one of the many applications that we are currently seized with. The loss that we intend to recover is actually substantially a lot more than what we currently have.
“We have about 17 matters to the estimated value of around R50-billion that needs to come back to the fiscus‚” he said. Acting head of the Specialised Commercial Crimes Unit (SCCU)‚ Advocate Malini Govender‚ also interviewed by the broadcaster‚ denied rumours that warrants had been issued for the Gupta brothers or any other person in relation to state capture.
“The reality is that no applications have been made to the prosecutors that are seized with this matter‚” she said‚ explaining that matters of this level of complexity were usually investigated until trial ready before anyone was taken to court.
“The police would only make applications in circumstances where they are of the view that the persons who should be summoned to court may be a flight risk‚ for example‚” Govender explained.
“In those instances they would make an affidavit and make an application for a warrant‚ prosecutors would have to assure themselves there is sufficient evidence to support the application and then the application will be put before a magistrate.
“And none of those processes have unfolded with respect to any of the state capture matters‚” she added.
She revealed that around 20 prosecutors within the NPA were assigned to eight different legs of a massive probe and a collaborative effort was underway between various units of the NPA‚ Hawks and entities such as the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission.
Meanwhile the action by the NPA got reaction from all corners of the country.
Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services chairperson‚ Dr Mathole Motshekga‚ said the Committee welcomed the process undertaken by the AFU and expressed a hope that it would continue "without fear or favour".
“Criminals must know that the law will deal with them in all respects in the harshest possible way. Nobody is above the law‚” said Dr Motshekga.
Corruption Watch's David Lewis said the organisation welcomed the order.
"While this is a welcome development‚ it is the tip of the iceberg. Most South Africans could identify several cabinet ministers as well as current and former senior executives and board members of Eskom‚ Transnet‚ Prasa‚ McKinsey‚ SAP‚ the SABC‚ MultiChoice and South China Rail‚ to name but a few who should be charged criminally. This applies equally to senior executives of SARS‚" Lewis said.
He added that while the action has astablished that there are some people of integrity within the criminal justice system‚ Corruption Watch was not confident that "robust and competent" criminal proceeding would be launched while Abrahams was still the head of the NPA.
“At the end of last year‚ the High Court‚ pursuant to an application filed by Corruption Watch‚ removed Abrahams from office‚” Lewis SAID. “The court‚ mindful of the president’s conflict of interest‚ empowered the deputy president [Cyril Ramaphosa] to appoint a new national director of public prosecutions. We urge him to make this appointment without delay.”