We've got news for you.

Register on SowetanLIVE at no cost to receive newsletters, read exclusive articles & more.
Register now

Zuma lawyer says state leaked medical records and brought in specialist to examine former president on the sly

Former president Jacob Zuma Zuma wants prosecutor Billy Downer, and all NPA advocates, off the case in which he faces corruption charges, claiming they are biased. File photo.
Former president Jacob Zuma Zuma wants prosecutor Billy Downer, and all NPA advocates, off the case in which he faces corruption charges, claiming they are biased. File photo.
Image: Gallo Images/Volksblad/Mlungisi Louw

Former president Jacob Zuma has fired another salvo in his bid to have prosecutor Billy Downer removed from his arms deal corruption case, accusing him of leaking a confidential document about his health and “unlawfully” sending a medical specialist, accompanied by a police officer, to examine him.

Zuma’s attorney Bethuel Thusini filed the affidavit ahead of Thursday’s virtual hearing before Pietermaritzburg high court judge Piet Koen, when the case against Zuma and French arms company Thales was adjourned again until later this month.

The state has been given until September 16 to file its response to the latest allegations.

Zuma wants Downer, and all National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) advocates, off the case, arguing they are biased.

His trial, when it eventually begins, will kick off with his “special plea” in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act during which Zuma has indicated he wishes to give oral evidence.

Thusini has made an application to admit further evidence during the hearing of the plea. He said this will show that Downer had more recently been implicated in further acts of “alleged serious misconduct” which supports Zuma’s bid for his disqualification from prosecuting him.

He said the court should take judicial notice of the fact that Zuma was released from custody on medical parole on September 5 because of his deteriorating health.

He, however, remains in a private specialist hospital until his doctors deem it medically appropriate to discharge him.

At the last hearing in August, his legal team presented a doctor’s report  from Brig-Gen Dr Mcebisi Zukile Mdutywa from the defence department’s Military Health Services, which stated he was undergoing an extensive medical evaluation for an emergency procedure which carried a “significant risk to life”, and it could take six months before he is better.

Koen ordered, by consent, that Zuma’s legal team would file a more comprehensive report by August 20. Following that the state, if it wished to, could get its own experts on board and examine him.

However, the filing of the medical report was delayed by a week.

The complaint is that Downer jumped the gun and wanted access to Zuma’s medical records and his specialist to examine him prior to the comprehensive medical report.

This, Thusini said, showed Downer had already formed an opinion that Zuma was “feigning his own sickness” and it was contrary to the court order.

Thusini said his client alleged two recent specific acts of misconduct against Downer “aided and abetted or enabled by the NPA” which demonstrated a continuous pattern designed to mire Zuma’s prosecution “with the effect that he is treated as if he is guilty of the crimes without leading any evidence”.

One, he said, was the deliberate leaking of Zuma’s medical report to the media.

This was coupled with the NPA’s stance on the medical report — indicating that he was feigning sickness — which was a grave violation of Zuma's constitutional rights.

This was borne out by the NPA’s refusal to agree to a postponement which was sought on the basis of a summarised preliminary medical report, in the form of a confidential letter, by medical doctors employed by the Military Health Services.

Thusini said on August 9 this year Downer “strangely” filed an unsolicited affidavit in which he disclosed and annexed the confidential medical report, before Zuma’s application for the postponement had been filed.

“While preparing our application, an inquiry was made by a journalist who appeared to have a source in the NPA and who broke the story of the medical report and, to our utter shock and surprise, referred to its contents in such a way that it was abundantly clear the journalist had read or had been advised of its contents.”

Thusini said this was in spite of pleas by Zuma’s legal team to treat the report with the strictest confidentiality.

There was no evidence to support Downer’s view that Zuma, either alone or in cahoots with the state doctors, was intent on subverting the interests of justice, he said.

“This is a serious allegation. We have come to accept such insults from the biased media, but it cannot be counternanced from an organ of state. The leaking of the medical letter was reported to the president in a complaint filed with him and copied to the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) and the minister of justice.

“The president has since informed us that he has directed a full investigation to be conducted,” he said.

To “add insult to injury”, without any legal basis, Downer sent a private doctor, a professor Sarkin, accompanied by a police investigator, a Col du Plooy, to the private hospital to conduct an illegal medical examination of Zuma.

Thusini said this was in breach of Koen’s previous order which stated the state could get its own doctors to examine him, but only after a detailed medical report had been given to the NPA for it to formulate an opinion.

“The fact that Downer and his prosecutors will not believe the word of state doctors unless the medical report is checked by Prof Sarkin, who has never treated Zuma, is a telling indication of the underlying prejudice and undermining of Zuma, his medical team and possibly his lawyers.

“It has never been made clear to Zuma who Prof Sarkin is, and why he was specifically chosen for this medical mission.”

Thusini has attached his complaint to President Cyril Ramaphosa and Ramaphosa’s response, in which he states: “We take note of the serious misconduct you make in your letter and we view these allegations in a serious light.”

Ramaphosa said the matter has been referred to the minister of justice and correctional services, who has final responsibility over the NPA, who in turn, has been asked to refer the matter to the Legal Practice Council.

In correspondence from the NPA to Mdutywa, also attached to the application, the NPA states it has appointed Prof Andrew Sarkin, a cardiologist and specialist physician with more than 30 years’ experience, to examine Zuma with a view to determining his fitness to attend court and stand trial. Two dates were proposed: August 24 or 25.

“Prof Sarkin will require access to Mr Zuma’s patient file and medical records, including x-rays, blood results, scans, procedure reports and all other patient information.”

The correspondence notes that Prof Gert Saayman, chief state pathologist and head of the department of forensic medicine at the University of Pretoria, at the request of the state and in compliance with Koen’s order, had attempted to get access to Zuma’s medical records.

“He required the information to advise the state in what areas of specialisation a state-appointed medical practitioner should be chosen. Prof Saayman was not able to obtain any information from you. In the circumstances, the state appointed Prof Sarkin.”

Further correspondence speaks of a meeting between Kenneth Mthombeni, acting regional commissioner of the department of correctional services in KwaZulu-Natal, and Col du Plooy, on August 11.

This letter, signed by Downer, says Mthombeni told Du Plooy he remained responsible for granting access to Zuma including while he was hospitalised at the Pretoria Heart Hospital, and the NPA must make a formal written application to see him.


Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

Commenting is subject to our house rules.