Beware of scams when investing in unlisted companies
Investing in unlisted shares or private equity can deliver good returns if you invest in reputable unlisted public companies, but you need some expertise to avoid investing in lemons.
Many an investor has lost money after falling for promises of fantastic returns from yet-to-be-listed companies because they have failed to interrogate how those returns could be made.
Relying on a qualified, experienced adviser is wise, but not checking out your adviser's credentials can lead to losses.
This is what Tshego*, a metal-lurgist working for a mining company, discovered when she took advice from Sandro Veloza and invested about R123 500 in unlisted shares.
Tshego complained to the Ombud for Financial Services Providers or FAIS ombud that she hasn't received a cent of her money back.
Naresh Tulsie, the ombud, has ordered Veloza, from Durbanville in Cape Town, and his company, Silver Seed Capital, to repay Tshego.
Veloza did not respond to the ombud's request for his side of the story, and the ombud concluded from the documents and Tshego's version that he had not been honest and had misappropriated her money.
According to the ruling, Veloza offered Tshego shares in businesses called UG2 Platinum and Lazaron Biotechnologies as he claimed Silver Seed Capital was raising funds for them.
Tshego told the ombud she made the investment on Veloza's advice, was confident that she was dealing with a registered financial services provider and that Veloza had investigated the businesses that he recommended.
She invested various amounts between 2006 and 2011 but had no share certificates proving her share ownership.
In 2015, she found out that Silver Seed Capital's licence to give advice had been withdrawn the year before.
She was aggrieved and asked to withdraw her money, the ruling says.Tulsi says an investment adviser is legally obliged to give your advice that is honest, fair, delivered with due skill, care and diligence.
They are also obliged to find out your circumstances and recommend investments that are suitable for you.
But, according to the ombud, Veloza attempted to contract out of his legal duty by adding in a clause in the investment application form in terms of which investors agreed they had determined if the investment was suitable for themselves.
“There is no indication that [Tshego] was truly aware of the risks inherent to the investments, or that she was investing in high risk ventures where her capital could be lost,” Tulsie said.
On investigating UG2 Platinum, the ombud’s office also found that Veloza was in fact one of the directors and the company secretary of UG2 Platinum but had failed to disclose these important facts – a conflict of interest - to Tshego. The application form which Tshego signed indicated only that Silver Seed may have an interest of 15% or more in the company of which shares are being purchased.
Besides ordering Veloza to return her money, the ombud recommended Tshego lay a charge with the police.
The ombud also escalated the matter to the Financial Sector Conduct Authority for further steps.The ruling notes that the ombud has had a number of complaints about Veloza and Silver Seed Capital and it is the second determination the ombud has made against Silver Seed Capital.
* Not her real name
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments? Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.