When President Jacob Zuma signed the Taxation Laws Amendment Act late last year he wasn’t aware of Cosatu’s objections with regard to the proposed annuitisation of provident fund benefits.
“The concerns were only brought to the President’s attention after he had signed the bill,” said Minister in the Presidency Jeff Radebe.
At a post-cabinet briefing on Thursday morning Radebe had to field a barrage of questions from journalists about the postponement of the provident fund rules in the legislation.
The bill has been referred back to parliament to make hasty amendments that will defer the implementation of the provident fund provisions. These amendments need to be made before the initial implementation date of 1 March 2016 – a date Radebe believes is within reach.
“The deferment of the implementation date is based on the lack of effective consultation between government and stakeholders,” Radebe said. “Cosatu is not the only organisation which opposes the Bill – we’ve had objections from sections of business as well.”
Radebe was asked if government had to give in to pressure from Cosatu in light of the upcoming local government elections. Said Radebe: “We don’t’ take decisions based on threats. But when concerns are raised we can’t remain unmoved.
“Cosatu doesn’t have to rubber stamp decisions of Cabinet,” Radebe added, but admitted that consultation about the amendments had not been effective.
Fin24
Radebe: Zuma heard of Cosatu objections after he signed tax bill
When President Jacob Zuma signed the Taxation Laws Amendment Act late last year he wasn’t aware of Cosatu’s objections with regard to the proposed annuitisation of provident fund benefits.
“The concerns were only brought to the President’s attention after he had signed the bill,” said Minister in the Presidency Jeff Radebe.
At a post-cabinet briefing on Thursday morning Radebe had to field a barrage of questions from journalists about the postponement of the provident fund rules in the legislation.
The bill has been referred back to parliament to make hasty amendments that will defer the implementation of the provident fund provisions. These amendments need to be made before the initial implementation date of 1 March 2016 – a date Radebe believes is within reach.
“The deferment of the implementation date is based on the lack of effective consultation between government and stakeholders,” Radebe said. “Cosatu is not the only organisation which opposes the Bill – we’ve had objections from sections of business as well.”
Radebe was asked if government had to give in to pressure from Cosatu in light of the upcoming local government elections. Said Radebe: “We don’t’ take decisions based on threats. But when concerns are raised we can’t remain unmoved.
“Cosatu doesn’t have to rubber stamp decisions of Cabinet,” Radebe added, but admitted that consultation about the amendments had not been effective.
Fin24
Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Trending
Latest Videos