"Essentially, the proposal is to conclude a memorandum of understanding with Tottenham Hotspur. It is non-binding. Such a proposal must still pass muster within the tourism ministry and is subject to the concurrence of National Treasury to conform to government prescripts.
"Minister Sisulu is awaiting a report and to be briefed by the SA Tourism board as they are independent and take their own decisions on matters.
"It is mischievous to relate this to the imminent cabinet reshuffle.
"Minister Sisulu is in consultation with her legal team and will communicate the way forward in due course."
eNCA's UK correspondent Olly Barratt, who on Wednesday tweeted that his "sources suggest an agreement should be confirmed within days", told the TV news channel he thinks "there is an acceptance among those close to the deal that this is going to be controversial in South Africa".
"In terms of what SA would get for this reported amount is things like branding tie-ups, SA Tourism and South Africa being mentioned in social media posts by Spurs, something like the Rwanda deal with Arsenal of the sponsorship getting on shirts in some way too.
"It's that kind of arrangement we're looking at, which I'm being told is very close to being agreed and announced."
TimesLIVE reached out to SA Tourism for a response, which said it was formulating a statement. This had not arrived at the time of publishing.
SA Tourism plan to sponsor Spurs worth more than Rwanda deal with Arsenal
Image: Catherine Ivill/Getty Images
The cost of a reported plan by South Africa Tourism to sponsor Tottenham Hotspur could work out at more than Rwanda's similar deal with Arsenal.
Daily Maverick reported on Wednesday that the government, through its marketing agency SA Tourism, is proposing a 36-month deal, believed to be a sleeve sponsorship, with English Premier League club Tottenham at a cost of £42.5m (R910m) over three years.
A spokesperson for tourism minister Lindiwe Sisulu said she was not involved with the proposal, and that it would need to pass muster within the ministry and would be subject to the concurrence of National Treasury to conform to government prescripts.
The website cites a PowerPoint presentation in its possession stamped with the logo of SA Tourism. Quoting sources, Daily Maverick reported Sisulu's aim was to conclude the deal before the impending cabinet reshuffle by President Cyril Ramaphosa potentially removes the minister from the tourism portfolio.
The SA Tourism presentation claims the expenditure of just under R1bn for the sponsorship would yield a return in tourism for South Africa of R6bn.
Reports on the deal have sparked controversy, given the load-shedding and economic crises and crumbling sports infrastructure.
The amount spent might also raise questions. The Daily Maverick report says SA Tourism's presentation encourages the country to follow in the footsteps of other destination management organisations promoting travel destinations. Examples cited are Abu Dhabi’s sponsorship of Manchester City, Malta and Manchester United and Rwanda’s deal with Arsenal.
Image: Matthew Ashton - AMA/Getty Images
Reports are that Rwanda's sleeve sponsorship with the Gunners, who are leading the Premier League in 2022-23, a bigger team than London neighbours Spurs and a more recognisable brand globally, was signed in 2021 at a value of £10m per year for four years.
The cost of SA's three-year deal with Tottenham would work out at £14.2m a year.
Arsenal have won the English First Division/Premier League 13 times, including four titles since 1990, and the FA Cup 14 times. Spurs have won the Premier League twice, in 1950–51 and 1960–61, and the FA Cup eight times.
Sisulu's spokesperson Mpumzi Zuzile disputed the facts in the Daily Maverick report.
"Sadly, this article is riddled with inaccuracies and untruths aimed at tarnishing minister Sisulu's image," Zuzile said.
Buoyant Tottenham face first real test of credentials at City
"There is no doubt the report seeks to drive a political agenda rather than to inform the public truthfully in line with journalism ethos.
"The report falsely claims minister Sisulu is forcing SA Tourism to push the deal through before she is moved from the tourism portfolio. This is a blatant lie. This reported deal is purely a SA Tourism board matter on which minister Sisulu has not been formally briefed by the board.
"Like any other board, the SA Tourism board is independent and minister Sisulu does not interfere with its decisions.
"Proposals are received by SA Tourism, and are processed by a project team, then are sent through to the executive committee before being presented to the SA Tourism board.
"In the portfolios minister Sisulu has served since the dawn of democracy, her contribution to government speaks for itself. Even Daily Maverick through its source indicates this proposal dates back to 2017, when minister Sisulu held a different portfolio.
"Essentially, the proposal is to conclude a memorandum of understanding with Tottenham Hotspur. It is non-binding. Such a proposal must still pass muster within the tourism ministry and is subject to the concurrence of National Treasury to conform to government prescripts.
"Minister Sisulu is awaiting a report and to be briefed by the SA Tourism board as they are independent and take their own decisions on matters.
"It is mischievous to relate this to the imminent cabinet reshuffle.
"Minister Sisulu is in consultation with her legal team and will communicate the way forward in due course."
eNCA's UK correspondent Olly Barratt, who on Wednesday tweeted that his "sources suggest an agreement should be confirmed within days", told the TV news channel he thinks "there is an acceptance among those close to the deal that this is going to be controversial in South Africa".
"In terms of what SA would get for this reported amount is things like branding tie-ups, SA Tourism and South Africa being mentioned in social media posts by Spurs, something like the Rwanda deal with Arsenal of the sponsorship getting on shirts in some way too.
"It's that kind of arrangement we're looking at, which I'm being told is very close to being agreed and announced."
TimesLIVE reached out to SA Tourism for a response, which said it was formulating a statement. This had not arrived at the time of publishing.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Trending
Related articles
Latest Videos