Zille slams Maimane’s stance on public protector
Former DA leader Helen Zille has criticised her successor Mmusi Maimane's stance on public protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane, saying the party faces a "serious dilemma".
This after Maimane spoke out on the DA's relationship with Mkhwebane.
Maimane said that although he was pleased with Mkhwebane's finding regarding president Cyril Ramaphosa's campaign funding, she must go.
He added that the Constitutional Court judgment against her strengthened the party's case to have her removed.
Speaking on eNCA, Zille said Maimane should not have approached the public protector's office about Bosasa's donation to Ramaphosa's ANC presidential campaign while at the same time calling for her removal.
"When you have a compromised state, when you have a captured state and we believe that the public protector has been captured by a faction of the ANC, which is very unfortunate because the public protector should do her job without fear or favour.
Listen to the latest episode of Sunday Times Politics Weekly
SHOWDOWN: the Public Protector vs the President
"What is an opposition party to do when there is seemingly a legitimate complaint under the Executive Ethics Act and that is your only recourse? So it is a terrible dilemma for the party. Either you let an alleged breach of the Executive Ethics Act go by or you take it to a compromised public protector," said Zille.
However, speaking on the move by the DA to approach the public protector to have Ramaphosa investigated, she said it was the opposition's role and duty to take up any alleged breach of the Executive Ethics Act.
"But it is a terrible dilemma to have such a compromised public protector and you have a complaint that only she can adjudicate," she said. "Things are not cut and dry or black and white in our politics. There are complex moral dilemmas and that is what we need to understand."
Social media and tweeting
Zille, who herself has attracted controversy with tweets on the benefits of colonialism and alleged black privilege, said free speech and open debate is "absolutely critical".
"Vigorous debates involve saying things that aren't popular, and almost every progress in human history has involved people who have said things that aren't popular, especially when vested interests are challenged.
"I will continue challenging vested interests, especially those that undermine the building of common nationhood and the inclusive economy that we need," she said.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments? Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.