"What we see and what we call 'corruption' is what happens in the procurement of goods and services in the public sector. The real incidents is what happens in the procurement‚ and we have come to see it in a number of manifestations at Eskom‚" Mabuza said.
He added that Maritz did not disclose a deal between Eskom and Chinese company Huarong Energy Africa.
Maritz was disciplined on charges related to his approving a payment to a Hong Kong company after Eskom secured a R25bn loan from Huarong Energy Africa‚ as well as for penning a letter to McKinsey & Company absolving it from paying back R1.6bn unlawfully paid to it and Trillian.
Mabuza said he was not surprised that charges brought against Koko by the previous administration at Eskom did not stick.
'The name is corruption‚ but the game is procurement': Eskom's chair
Image: Masi Losi
Eskom board chair Jabu Mabuza told the state capture inquiry on Friday that corruption at the power supplier manifested itself within the procurement processes.
"The name is corruption‚ but the game is procurement‚" Mabuza told deputy chief justice Raymond Zondo.
Mabuza went on to outline disciplinary action taken against now former Eskom executives Shaun Maritz and Matshela Koko after his board took over in January 2018.
"What we see and what we call 'corruption' is what happens in the procurement of goods and services in the public sector. The real incidents is what happens in the procurement‚ and we have come to see it in a number of manifestations at Eskom‚" Mabuza said.
Eskom the 'main theatre' for state capture: Jabu Mabuza
He added that Maritz did not disclose a deal between Eskom and Chinese company Huarong Energy Africa.
Maritz was disciplined on charges related to his approving a payment to a Hong Kong company after Eskom secured a R25bn loan from Huarong Energy Africa‚ as well as for penning a letter to McKinsey & Company absolving it from paying back R1.6bn unlawfully paid to it and Trillian.
Mabuza said he was not surprised that charges brought against Koko by the previous administration at Eskom did not stick.
"We decided we were going to place charges in front of him and a disciplinary process that is not a sham. We picked the four charges that we thought would stick and we presented it to him‚ and we viewed them seriously enough‚" Mabuza said.
ANC MP lashes out at former Eskom boss Matshela Koko in heated parliament speech
"Those charges‚ there's no way they would have stuck. This time we were clear that we would take due process."
Koko was alleged to have breached his fiduciary and statutory duties and responsibilities as acting group chief executive of Eskom in relation to the R600m payment to Gupta-linked company‚ Trillian.
He also failed to declare a conflict of interest and distributed confidential Eskom documents in November 2015 to people associated with the Gupta family.
The testimony continues.
Eskom chair Jabu Mabuza to take the hot seat at state capture inquiry
"What we see and what we call 'corruption' is what happens in the procurement of goods and services in the public sector. The real incidents is what happens in the procurement‚ and we have come to see it in a number of manifestations at Eskom‚" Mabuza said.
He added that Maritz did not disclose a deal between Eskom and Chinese company Huarong Energy Africa.
Maritz was disciplined on charges related to his approving a payment to a Hong Kong company after Eskom secured a R25bn loan from Huarong Energy Africa‚ as well as for penning a letter to McKinsey & Company absolving it from paying back R1.6bn unlawfully paid to it and Trillian.
Mabuza said he was not surprised that charges brought against Koko by the previous administration at Eskom did not stick.
High electricity prices will push consumers to renewable energy - Jeff Radebe
"We decided we were going to place charges in front of him and a disciplinary process that is not a sham. We picked the four charges that we thought would stick and we presented it to him‚ and we viewed them seriously enough‚" Mabuza said.
"Those charges‚ there's no way they would have stuck. This time we were clear that we would take due process."
Koko was alleged to have breached his fiduciary and statutory duties and responsibilities as acting group chief executive of Eskom in relation to the R600m payment to Gupta-linked company‚ Trillian.
He also failed to declare a conflict of interest and distributed confidential Eskom documents in November 2015 to people associated with the Gupta family.
The testimony continues.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Trending
Related articles
Latest Videos