“Before then, it will be improper for me to comment on the audit. I haven’t even received the management letter from the AG’s office, so I do not know what you are talking about,” he added.
The mayor’s spokesperson, Samkelo Mgobozi, however, confirmed that the meeting did indeed take place, but would not be drawn on its contents.
“I can confirm the meeting did indeed take place at 10:30am on Friday. [However] some matters are sub judice and I don’t want to prejudice anything directly related or incidental to other city processes I’m not authorised to divulge at this stage,” Mgobozi said.
He said Mosola had no choice but to accept the AG’s finding and that not signing the tender as irregular would amount to an offence.
“The city manager would commit an act of financial misconduct if he deliberately or negligently contravened the provisions of the MFMA by refusing to disclose the irregular expenditure incurred on the contract in the annual financial statements,” he said.
According to the AG’s preliminary findings, Mosola took total control of the procurement process that led to the appointment of GladAfrica.
He initiated the process, determined the demands of the project management unit, and approved the process to be followed. This should have been done by the supply chain management department, according to the AG.
The GladAfrica saga has led to a tug of war between Msimanga and Mosola, which has led to at least three attempts to suspend the municipal manager through council.