A tractor‚ trailer and game - that's what Phahlane’s alleged middle man received R1m for
A tractor‚ trailer and game. That’s what disgraced former national police commissioner Lieutenant-General Khomotso Phahlane’s alleged middle man - a second-hand car salesman - received R1-million for.
But an affidavit written by IPID boss Robert McBride this week says this claim is ridiculous. He questions why‚ if there was nothing to hide‚ the owner of the vehicles which were either sold or bought by the dealership was listed as “John Doe” and that all the files for the sales were missing. He says a clear link has been established between the alleged offences and what is in the warrant.
In December‚ Keating launched an urgent high court application to have IPID and Hawks raids on the properties of his company and staff declared illegal.
Keating claims that search and seizure warrants were illegally obtained‚ were littered with errors and were designed to close his business down. He also questioned why police used private forensic lawyers to assist them in their operation.
Keating and FDA are being investigated for allegedly paying kickbacks to Phahlane via a second-hand Pretoria car dealership and international bank accounts in return for being awarded tenders.
Keating claims that he has a longstanding relationship with the car dealer‚ Durand Snyman.
The kickbacks allegedly saw Phahlane and other officers‚ involved in the alleged scam‚ either being given free luxury vehicles or being sold cars at far below their cost.
Police officers involved in procurement processes‚ when trading in their cars to the dealership‚ were also allegedly paid more than what their vehicles were worth.
Keating failed to respond to queries from the publication on McBride’s affidavit or requests for an interview.
The December search and seizure operations saw investigators confiscate thousands of documents and financial records.
The raids were part of a larger corruption‚ racketeering and money laundering investigation into Phahlane and senior police forensic and procurement officials.
McBride‚ in his affidavit‚ described the allegations as incredibly serious‚ “involving the highest levels of the police”.
In response to Keating’s urgent high court application‚ McBride described the challenge to the raids as something that “is to be expected.
“There is a concerted effort to conceal the alleged criminal conduct by any number of means ... This [high court] application is clearly a delaying tactic.”
He said the evidence seized was clearly incriminating against those implicated.
“They provide direct evidence in relation to the alleged offences.
“The fraud and the corruption involve not only persons whose positions exist exclusively to serve the public‚ but also involves very substantial funds that were utilised for purposes entirely anathema to the public interest for which such funds were intended.”
McBride states that IPID and Hawks investigators were executing their legal duties to investigate alleged criminal conduct.
On Keating’s assertion that the raids were designed to shut FDA‚ McBride said the business was “dependent for its survival on the proceeds of the alleged offences.
“He [Keating] should be prepared to face the consequences of his actions‚ including the potential negative impact on his business and its employees.
“A clear link has been established between the alleged offences and what is in the warrant.”
On the use of private forensic lawyers‚ McBride said they were used to identify specific documents and to provide advice.
He questioned Keating’s assertions that money paid to the car dealership was because he was purchasing a tractor‚ trailer and game‚ “for which there is no permit”.
“The payments of over R1-million made from Snyman’s Windhoek bank account are suspicious and support the allegations. The source of the funds is the subject of the investigation with no supporting documents for the payments.”
McBride questioned why‚ if there was nothing to hide‚ the owner of the vehicles which were either sold or bought by the dealership were listed as “John Doe” and that all the files for the sales were missing.
“Mr Keating and Mr Snyman are more than welcome to explain their financial transactions and dealings as part of the further investigation.
“It is telling that Keating and Snyman do not attempt to explain all their dealings‚ but rather choose to make vague unsubstantiated allegations in a clear attempt to muddy the waters.”
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments? Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.