THERE is too much evidence against Judge Nkola Motata in his drunken driving trial for the court to acquit him, state counsel saidyesterday.
THERE is too much evidence against Judge Nkola Motata in his drunken driving trial for the court to acquit him, state counsel saidyesterday.
"The evidence before this court ... is it something that should be answered for? Yes, it is," prosecutor Zaais van Zyl told the South Gauteng high court.
He was presenting the state's argument against a discharge application brought by the defence.
Van Zyl said the court could not dismiss the evidence it had been presented with. This included a note Motata wrote shortly after the accident, which had several grammatical and spelling mistakes.
"Its quality is a reflection of his level of intoxication." He also said it was clear that Motata had fallen down when he was pulled from his car.
"The point is that he fell."
Van Zyl also referred to cellphone recordings made of Motata at the scene of the accident which were presented in court to prove he was intoxicated.
"Not a word in the recording has been challenged," said Van Zyl.
In a case that has been dragging on since 2007, magistrate Desmond Nair had postponed the matter in April to give the state time to prepare its arguments against a discharge application.
Motata's lawyer, Bantubonke Tokoto, told the court at the last hearing that the state's evidence was weak.
Motata, 60, crashed his Jaguar into the perimeter wall of Richard Baird's house in Hurlingham, Johannesburg, in 2007, allegedly while drunk.
Tokoto said for witnesses to smell liquor on someone was not sufficient evidence to indicate drunkenness.
The Johannesburg magistrate's court heard last year that the concentration of alcohol in Motata's blood was 0,2g per 100ml at the time of the accident. The legal limit is 0,05g per 100ml.
But Danie Dorfling, who was Motata's lawyer at that time, told the court that the Johannesburg forensic laboratory procedures had been erroneous, and that they could have affected the outcome of the assessment of his client's blood.
Tokoto, at the last hearing, accused Baird of being racist and questioned his credibility.
"He was a dishonest witness ... and made disturbing racist remarks. He saw a black judge and called him a drunken kaffir, it's a criminal offence to say that ... he humiliated him."
Tokoto said five cellphone pictures Baird took of Motata that night could have been manipulated.
The trial had been delayed several times, partly because Motata twice changed his legal team.
Nair said final judgment would be on June 25 or 26. - Sapa.
STATE HAS 'A CASE AGAINST motata'
THERE is too much evidence against Judge Nkola Motata in his drunken driving trial for the court to acquit him, state counsel saidyesterday.
THERE is too much evidence against Judge Nkola Motata in his drunken driving trial for the court to acquit him, state counsel saidyesterday.
"The evidence before this court ... is it something that should be answered for? Yes, it is," prosecutor Zaais van Zyl told the South Gauteng high court.
He was presenting the state's argument against a discharge application brought by the defence.
Van Zyl said the court could not dismiss the evidence it had been presented with. This included a note Motata wrote shortly after the accident, which had several grammatical and spelling mistakes.
"Its quality is a reflection of his level of intoxication." He also said it was clear that Motata had fallen down when he was pulled from his car.
"The point is that he fell."
Van Zyl also referred to cellphone recordings made of Motata at the scene of the accident which were presented in court to prove he was intoxicated.
"Not a word in the recording has been challenged," said Van Zyl.
In a case that has been dragging on since 2007, magistrate Desmond Nair had postponed the matter in April to give the state time to prepare its arguments against a discharge application.
Motata's lawyer, Bantubonke Tokoto, told the court at the last hearing that the state's evidence was weak.
Motata, 60, crashed his Jaguar into the perimeter wall of Richard Baird's house in Hurlingham, Johannesburg, in 2007, allegedly while drunk.
Tokoto said for witnesses to smell liquor on someone was not sufficient evidence to indicate drunkenness.
The Johannesburg magistrate's court heard last year that the concentration of alcohol in Motata's blood was 0,2g per 100ml at the time of the accident. The legal limit is 0,05g per 100ml.
But Danie Dorfling, who was Motata's lawyer at that time, told the court that the Johannesburg forensic laboratory procedures had been erroneous, and that they could have affected the outcome of the assessment of his client's blood.
Tokoto, at the last hearing, accused Baird of being racist and questioned his credibility.
"He was a dishonest witness ... and made disturbing racist remarks. He saw a black judge and called him a drunken kaffir, it's a criminal offence to say that ... he humiliated him."
Tokoto said five cellphone pictures Baird took of Motata that night could have been manipulated.
The trial had been delayed several times, partly because Motata twice changed his legal team.
Nair said final judgment would be on June 25 or 26. - Sapa.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Trending
Latest Videos