Wed May 23 17:05:35 SAST 2012
Wed May 23 17:05:35 SAST 2012

Racist to check for criminal record?

Jan 12, 2012 | Sapa-AP | 75 comments

Pepsi pays damages

WASHINGTON - Pepsi Beverages Co. has agreed to pay $3.1 million to settle federal charges of race discrimination for using criminal background checks to screen out job applicants.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission says the company’s policy of not hiring workers with arrest records disproportionately excluded more than 300 black applicants.

Under the policy, applicants with arrest records were not hired even if they had never been convicted of a crime.

The company also denied employment to those arrested or convicted of minor offences.

The EEOC says using arrest and conviction records to deny employment can be illegal if it’s not relevant for the job.

The company has since adopted a new criminal background policy.

Comments

Wed May 23 17:05:35 SAST 2012 ::
avatar image
Jan 12, 2012

MommaC

I assume this is in the USA?
Can it be possible that their labour courts are even more crazy than ours are?
Report Abuse
avatar image
Jan 12, 2012

DeCock1

lol....so a conviction of drinking and driving has no harsh employment effect....they must stop scaring us in SA....Viva Labour Laws viva.....lol
Report Abuse
avatar image
Jan 12, 2012

KatakataEmaotoAditshepe

Listen to these bloody boere.
Report Abuse
avatar image
Jan 12, 2012

CheeseBoy

The article was not clear. Sowetan why publish articles which are not complete? somebody is still drunk from New year fever there at Sowetan.

First its a headline that demands we buy the new.s paper and now this?

This is low, even for you Sowetan, Low indeed.


Question
Are these criminal checks being restricted to a particular racial groups(s) ?

SOWETAN WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE WORD NEW.S.?????????????????????
Report Abuse
avatar image
Jan 12, 2012

DeCock1

MommaC

thats the US for you....I am even appalled that they find the criminal checks racist....as to say a majority of the black people are criminals...so let there be no checks....thats prejudicial on its own....i would understand if the ruling was on the grounds of unfair treatment/discrimination...but the US always works differently compared to other countries....I just wish our Labour Law practitioners will move towards the same direction...viva!! lol

Report Abuse
avatar image
Jan 12, 2012

Julz

But wouldn't you want to know if the person employed by you, or hired to work next to you, committed murder or something? I would want to check first
Report Abuse
avatar image
Jan 12, 2012

MommaC

DeCock1

LOL
I don't think a drunk driving conviction will stop you getting a job in SA so no need to change the laws any more :)
Report Abuse
avatar image
Jan 12, 2012

KatakataEmaotoAditshepe

This is really like boere.
Report Abuse
avatar image
Jan 12, 2012

tumzangwana

@kataka

Whites do this everywhere especially in private sector,whites are rotten,rotten.
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
ayeye o nyannye motho wa modimo. haaaai ja ne....

Report Abuse
avatar image
Jan 12, 2012

DJWinner

I don't see anything wrong with background checks if they do it to black and whites. If they only do it to blacks, then it's racist.
Report Abuse

Read all 75 comments

Your Subscription

The SowetanLIVE Network