×

We've got news for you.

Register on SowetanLIVE at no cost to receive newsletters, read exclusive articles & more.
Register now

Minister must clarify suggested nuke deals: DA

Minister of Energy Tina Joemat-Pettersson
Minister of Energy Tina Joemat-Pettersson

Energy Minister Tina Joemat-Petterson needs to clarify the three nuclear deals it is apparently planning‚ the Democratic Alliance says.

The party called on the minister to table the Integrated Energy Plan (IEP) 2015 as a matter of urgency to allow parliament to scrutinise key issues contained in the document‚ including nuclear plans.

According to DA spokesman on energy matters Gordon Mackay the Integrated Energy Plan (IEP) 2015 presently before Cabinet indicated that government planned not one but up to three R1 trillion nuclear deals by 2050‚ all the while acknowledging that the procurement of nuclear energy could in fact be delayed until at least 2020‚ if not later.

Mackay noted that according to reports in the Sunday Times‚ the proposed IEP nuclear-generating capacity will be expanded to between 12 and 20 times of South Africa’s current installed nuclear capacity of 1830 MW.

“This effectively means that the Department of Energy (DoE) envisions a series of large-scale nuclear deals over the next 20 years‚ this despite ongoing and significant concerns on affordability by National Treasury and uncertainty as the impact on the cost of electricity for ordinary South Africans- particularly the poor.

“The purpose of the IEP is to provide a roadmap of the future energy landscape for South Africa in order to guide future energy infrastructure investments and policy development by providing a thorough analysis of competing technologies for the provision of sustainable and cost effective electricity‚” Mackay stated.

Far from being a thorough assessment of competing technologies however‚ the IEP was “nothing more than a slavish confirmation of the inevitability of the nuclear new build programme and is the product of political interference by the ANC government into the terrain of energy planning‚” Mackay added.

The IEP therefore failed to provide an assessment of a potential energy mix which excluded nuclear energy‚ this despite the international energy landscape where major nuclear nations such as Germany‚ France and the US were all reducing their reliance on nuclear in favour of cleaner and cheaper renewables and gas.

“Further‚ the IEP argues for an energy mix biased towards a combination of large scale nuclear and large scale decentralised renewables; this despite general international consensus that the two technologies are largely incompatible due to the variable nature of renewables electricity generation.

“Furthermore‚ the scope for gas in the IEP has deliberately been limited in order to produce a “nuclear heavy” energy road map. The IEP is way too conservative on the scope of gas within in the energy mix. Internationally‚ a number of gas producers are coming online and numerous new gas finds are being made across Africa. This will result in an increased availability of natural gas and the subsequent decrease in the price of natural gas‚” Mackay said.

He said the government should have used this IEP to aggressively pursue gas as an alternative energy form‚ which was far safer‚ cleaner‚ cheaper and more job friendly compared to the use of the potentially politically motivated and unaffordable nuclear build programme.

“The DA calls on Minister Joemat-Petterson to table this IEP as a matter of urgency and allow Parliament to scrutinise this document and address the key issues within this plan.

“The DA remains fundamentally opposed to costly‚ secretive nuclear deals which have the real potential to destroy any prospects of future economic growth and job creation and as such will not support Government’s latest and unimpressive solution to the energy crisis in the form of the Integrated Energy Plan‚” Mackay concluded.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.