Squatters rebuild shacks
SQUATTERS who had occupied a piece of municipal land illegally near Alexandra in northern Johannesburg, started rebuilding their shacks just hours after their structures were demolished by the city's police.
The Johannesburg Metro Police Department (JMPD) raided the shack land in Marlboro at about 3.30am and threw out an estimated 80 families - whom they claimed were trespassers - on to the streets.
The operation led to violent clashes that resulted in two squatters sustaining gunshot wounds, while a JMPD vehicle was set alight.
The squatters said chaos erupted after metro police officers, armed with crowbars, ordered them out of their shacks. The squatters refused to move because they said their eviction was illegal.
Squatter leader Michel Ndou said that some of the people had lived in the area for more than 11 years. He claimed they were given the go-ahead to return to the area by the Bramley police.
But the JMPD's Wayne Minnaar denied that the families had lived in the land for a long time. He warned them of follow-up eviction operations.
"We do not need an eviction order because these people occupied council land illegally. That amounts to trespassing. We will continue evicting them," he said.
THIS IS OUR PLACE: Residents of an informal settlement in Marlboro, near Alexandra, after their shacks were destroyed by the JMPD. PHOTOS: SIBUSISO MSIBI
THIS IS OUR PLACE: Residents of an informal settlement in Marlboro, near Alexandra, after their shacks were destroyed by the JMPD. PHOTOS: SIBUSISO MSIBI
Comments
tpaz
Land reform on its way......they should build shacks across the N1 ....near SandtonReport Abuse
hulas
Dont move until anc government provide you with free electrified houses with running water.Report Abuse
MommaC
They can build a shack within hours of it being broken down but the lazy sods can't put a wall around a toiletReport Abuse
Papage
Government should be giving them Building materials, bricks, cement not re-building shacksReport Abuse
Shredder
I hate shacks. They are good agents for rat breeding and are not safe.Report Abuse
CheeseBoy
We've all seen this before.Come rainy season these shacks are going to be washed away. Its going to be a national disaster and they would be moved up the queue for free RDP houses due to media pressure public outcry.
These lazy buggers are not as stupid as you think.
@Papage, I agree, they must get cement and build for themselves
Report Abuse
Dzel
MommaCThey can build a shack within hours of it being broken down but the lazy sods can't put a wall around a toilet
===================================================
They shouldn't have to build walls around toilets. This is the future of social housing as suggested by a party that shall remain nameless for the purpose of this discussion.
Report Abuse
Shredder
tpaz - Land reform on its way......they should build shacks across the N1 ....near Sandton====================================================================
I think you meant Moreleta Park, hahahahaha.
Actually, I really think they should build multiple storeys of RDP like flats. There are many people who are taking away from the needy living in the RDPs. All they want are stands, then the next thing they erect mansions on those stands, basically spiting at the faces of their poor neighbors. If they could build multiple storey flats (RDPs), those hyenas will buy houses like the rest of us and pay their bonds.
Report Abuse
MissBhakajuju
squatters must just follow the rules, we can't have shacks all over s.a......and some of them are working & cannot afford to build a 2 room house, but are willing to spend more than K1 on liqour.
its also unfair to the government, when people only want to live on hand outs.
Report Abuse
MommaC
DzelSo it is better (in your opinion) for a person to share a buletproof toilet with 50 or 60 other people rather than have their own toilet and contribute to the project?
Report Abuse
Read all 18 comments