The police must pay a Western Cape man R50,000 in damages for being unlawfully arrested and detained, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled
The court dismissed an appeal by the minister of safety and security against an order of the Western Cape High Court declaring the arrest and detention of Johannes Swart, who was a police officer, unlawful.
The SCA found no reason to interfere with the high court’s allocation of R50,000 plus interest in damages.
Swart was arrested by a constable without a warrant on a suspicion of drunk driving in May 2007. He was detained at De Doorns police station.
The criminal charges against him were withdrawn the next day after tests revealed that his blood alcohol level at the time of driving was below the permissible legal limit.
The key issue in the appeal was whether the mere smell of alcohol was sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion, on the part of the arresting official, that Swart was drunk.
Swart’s car landed in a ditch on a dangerous curve early in the morning. When he stopped two police officers to help him get it out, he was arrested.
The SCA held that the arresting official’s suspicion was not based on reasonable grounds and therefore the arrest and detention were unlawful.
The court found that Swart had behaved like a person in full control of himself at the time of his arrest.
Western Cape man gets damages for booze arrest
The police must pay a Western Cape man R50,000 in damages for being unlawfully arrested and detained, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled
The court dismissed an appeal by the minister of safety and security against an order of the Western Cape High Court declaring the arrest and detention of Johannes Swart, who was a police officer, unlawful.
The SCA found no reason to interfere with the high court’s allocation of R50,000 plus interest in damages.
Swart was arrested by a constable without a warrant on a suspicion of drunk driving in May 2007. He was detained at De Doorns police station.
The criminal charges against him were withdrawn the next day after tests revealed that his blood alcohol level at the time of driving was below the permissible legal limit.
The key issue in the appeal was whether the mere smell of alcohol was sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion, on the part of the arresting official, that Swart was drunk.
Swart’s car landed in a ditch on a dangerous curve early in the morning. When he stopped two police officers to help him get it out, he was arrested.
The SCA held that the arresting official’s suspicion was not based on reasonable grounds and therefore the arrest and detention were unlawful.
The court found that Swart had behaved like a person in full control of himself at the time of his arrest.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Trending
Latest Videos